Doctrine and Covenants 132 and Polygamy

Doctrine and Covenants Section 132 Timeline

Pre-Publication History of Section 132

June 1829

Joseph Smith[BIO] translates Jacob 2:24–30 in the Book of Mormon, where the prophet Jacob[BIO] condemns the Nephites for practicing polygamy but teaches that God may command plural marriage at specific times.[1][2]

Circa 1831

Joseph Smith, while working on his inspired translation of the Bible, asks God questions regarding polygamy, seeking clarification on the practices of biblical figures like Abraham, Jacob, David, and Solomon.[3][4]

August 1835

The original section 101 of the first edition of the Doctrine and Covenants—written by Oliver Cowdery[BIO] and included for publication while Joseph Smith was away from Kirtland, Ohio[5]—outlines the Church's general law of marriage, condemning polygamy and affirming monogamy.[6]

Circa 1835-1836

Joseph Smith secretly marries Fanny Alger[BIO] in Kirtland, Ohio, marking his first known plural marriage.[7]

April 3, 1836

Elijah[BIO] appears to Joseph Smith and Oliver Cowdery in the Kirtland Temple and restores the sealing keys.[8][9]

Circa 1841

In Nauvoo, Joseph Smith begins being sealed to other women under the principle of plural marriage.[10]

July 12, 1843

Joseph Smith receives the revelation now known as Doctrine and Covenants 132, which is witnessed by Hyrum Smith[BIO] and recorded by William Clayton.[BIO][11]

Circa July 12–13, 1843

Joseph Kingsbury[BIO] makes a copy of the revelation at the request of Newel K. Whitney.[BIO][12]

Circa July 13–15 1843

A few days after Joseph and Hyrum share the revelation with Emma Smith,[BIO] she reportedly burns the original copy written by William Clayton.[13] However, Newel K. Whitney retains the copy he had requested from Joseph Kingsbury.[14]

July 16, 1843

Joseph Smith gives a sermon echoing language from the revelation, teaching that a man must enter into an "everlasting covenant" with his wife, but does not explicitly mention plural marriage.[15]

August 12, 1843

Hyrum Smith reads the revelation on plural marriage to the Nauvoo High Council.[16][17][18]

Circa August 23–28, 1843

Willard Richards[BIO] writes to Brigham Young[BIO] about a "new revelation" from Joseph Smith.[19]

Circa 1843–1844

Various people report having privately read or heard of the revelation on plural marriage.[20][21]

October 28, 1843

Content from the revelation on plural marriage is referenced by John C. Bennett[BIO] in a letter published in an Iowa newspaper.[22]

January 5, 1844

Jacob Scott,[BIO] a Latter-day Saint living in Nauvoo, references teachings found in the revelation on plural marriage in a letter to his daughter.[23]

April 8, 1844

Hyrum recounts at a Church conference how Joseph taught him about eternal plural sealings.[24]

June 7, 1844

Content from the revelation on plural marriage is paraphrased in the Nauvoo Expositor.[25]

June 8, 1844

Hyrum appears to confirm the existence of the plural marriage revelation in a meeting with the Nauvoo City Council.[26]

June 10, 1844

Joseph alludes to concepts in the plural marriage revelation in a Nauvoo City Council meeting.[27]

June 27, 1844

Joseph is murdered in Carthage, Illinois.[28]

November 1, 1844

Content from the revelation on plural marriage is paraphrased in Sidney Rigdon's[BIO] periodical Messenger and Advocate.[29]

Circa 1846–1847

Copies of the revelation are made by Willard Richards and Horace K. Whitney.[BIO][30]

Circa 1846–1847

Brigham Young is given the manuscript copy of the revelation on plural marriage by Newel K. Whitney.[31]

Publication History of Section 132

August 29, 1852

Under the direction of Brigham Young, Orson Pratt[BIO] publicly announces the doctrine of plural marriage and reads the revelation on plural marriage during a special conference in Salt Lake City.[32]

September 14, 1852

Section 132 is printed by the Church for the first time by the Deseret News in Salt Lake City.[33]

January 1853

Section 132 is printed in both The Seer and the Millennial Star.[34]

1876

Section 132 is included in a new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants.[35]

1878

Section 132 is included in a new edition of the Pearl of Great Price.[36]

October 10, 1880

In general conference, Church members formally accept a new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, which contained section 132.[37]

1921

A new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants prepared by the Church removes the Lectures on Faith but retains sections 132.[38]

1981

A new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants prepared by the Church retains section 132.[39]

2013

The Church revises the 1981 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, retaining section 132.[40]

Expand Timeline

What is Doctrine and Covenants 132?

It is a revelation that was given to Joseph Smith[BIO] on July 12, 1843,[41] in response to his questions about the wives and concubines of people in the Bible and Emma Smith's[BIO] concerns about plural marriage.[42] It provides teachings on eternal marriage and the keys of the priesthood.[43]

When Doctrine and Covenants 132 was canonized in 1880,[44] it replaced the earlier Section 101, which had outlined the general law of marriage for the Church.[45]

What does section 132 have to do with polygamy?

Doctrine and Covenants 132 outlines the new and everlasting covenant of marriage and specifies that celestial marriage is required for exaltation.[46] It also states that plural marriage is justified when God commands it.[47]

Does section 132 command everyone to practice polygamy?

No. Doctrine and Covenants 132 states that plural marriage is only authorized for those whom God specifically commands.[48]

Wait, didn't Joseph receive revelation to practice plural marriage after he married other women?

No, probably not. Doctrine and Covenants 132 is the earliest known written revelation on plural marriage from Joseph, but he was reportedly receiving revelation on the subject as early as 1831.[49][50]

Why would Joseph be asking the Lord about this?

Joseph had reportedly already been receiving revelation on plural marriage,[51] and Emma had concerns about the practice.[52] Hyrum urged Joseph to write down a revelation on celestial and plural marriage, believing he could convince Emma of its truth and bring peace.[53]

How do we know that section 132 was from Joseph Smith?

It was recorded by William Clayton[BIO] in the presence of Hyrum Smith,[BIO][54] and both Joseph and Clayton recorded the event in their journals.[55][56] Early manuscript copies of the revelation were made by Joseph C. Kingsbury, Willard Richards, and Horace K. Whitney,[57] and accounts from eyewitnesses record that they saw a copy of the revelation or were informed of its contents.[58]

The first page of the handwritten copy of the revelation on celestial and plural marriage given on July 12, 1843, in the handwriting of Joseph C. Kingsbury, Joseph Smith's clerk.[59]

Is the oldest manuscript of Doctrine and Covenants 132 in Joseph's handwriting?

No. None of Joseph Smith's revelations are in his handwriting.[60]

The original manuscript was recorded by William Clayton, Joseph's scribe,[61] but it no longer exists.[62] The oldest surviving copy of the revelation was transcribed by Joseph C. Kingsbury,[BIO] one of Joseph's Nauvoo clerks, who copied the revelation within days after the original was recorded.[63] Horace K. Whitney,[BIO] another of Joseph's scribes, and Willard Richards[BIO] also recorded copies of the revelation.[64]

I've heard section 132 was altered by Brigham Young. Is that true?

No. While the original manuscript no longer exists,[65] the copy of it made within days of the revelation by Joseph C. Kingsbury has not been altered, and except for punctuation and spelling, matches the Richards and Whitney copies of the revelation,[66] which all match the 1852 published copy.[67][68]

Did Joseph Smith ever say section 132 wasn’t from him?

No. There is no record of Joseph ever denying that he received Doctrine and Covenants 132. Four days after the revelation was written down,[69] he publicly taught some of the principles found in it but did not mention polygamy.[70]

But didn't Joseph deny he practiced polygamy?

Yes. Joseph Smith publicly denied being involved in polygamy while privately practicing it.[71]

When was section 132 first presented to the Saints?

Doctrine and Covenants 132 was first privately shared with a select group of Saints before Joseph’s death.[72] Hyrum read it to a group of elders in the Nauvoo high council,[73] and three council members left the Church shortly afterward.[74]

The revelation was first published by the Deseret News in 1852,[75] the same year plural marriage was publicly announced by the Church.[76] It first appeared in the Doctrine and Covenants in 1876[77] and was canonized by sustaining vote in 1880.[78]

Section 132 as it appeared in the 1876 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants.[79]

Why did it take so long for it to get officially canonized?

It's unclear. The practice of plural marriage was kept secret during Joseph's lifetime and remained secret even when the 1844 version of the Doctrine and Covenants was published,[80] the year after the revelation was given.[81]

The revelation was published in the Deseret News in 1852,[82] but canonization did not take place until it was included in the 1876 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants,[83] along with 25 other revelations,[84] which was canonized in 1880.[85]

How did the Saints react to the revelation?

Some left the Church when they learned about the revelation,[86] while others accepted it as inspired.[87]

How did Emma react to it?

Emma was reportedly very upset by the revelation and struggled with its teachings.[88] She also reportedly burned the original copy of the manuscript,[89] although decades later, Emma denied doing so.[90]

Does Section 132 threaten that Emma would be "destroyed" if she doesn't accept plural marriage?

Yes. Section 132 states that Emma will be "destroyed" if she does not abide by "this commandment," which refers to accepting plural marriage.[91] This warning likely refers to spiritual consequences or the potential loss of exaltation for failing to obey God's commandments.[92][93]

The revelation states that if Emma did not accept "this commandment," Joseph would "do all things for her, even as he hath said,"[94] which is likely referring to deeding property to her.[95][96]

Was polygamy actually practiced in the bible?

Yes. The Bible mentions several people who practiced polygamy, including Abraham, Jacob, Isaac, Moses, Solomon, and David.[97]

Examples of Biblical Figures who Practiced Polygamy

Biblical Figure

Wives and/or Concubines

Abraham[BIO] Abraham was married to Sarah,[BIO] Hagar,[BIO] and later Keturah,[BIO] along with unnamed concubines.[98]

Jacob[BIO]

Jacob was married to Leah,[BIO] Rachel,[BIO] and their handmaids, Bilhah[BIO] and Zilpah.[BIO][99]

Isaac[BIO]

In the Bible, Isaac is only ever mentioned as being married to Rebekah[BIO][100] Section 132 seems to indicate that Isaac had additional wives that were not mentioned in the Bible,[101] but it's unclear.[102]

Moses[BIO]

Moses was married to Zipporah,[BIO] a Midianite, and an Ethiopian woman, possibly named Tharbis,[BIO][103] though no concubines are mentioned in scripture.[104]

Solomon[BIO]

Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines, which ultimately led to his spiritual downfall.[105]

David[BIO]

David had multiple wives, including Abigail and Ahinoam, before becoming king and added more after.[106]

Expand Table

Hagar to Abraham with Sarah (1749) by Joseph-Marie Vien.

Does the Bible or other scriptures condemn polygamy?

Yes and no. In the Bible, polygamy seems to be permitted and regulated by the Law of Moses,[107] and its stories show both positive and negative consequences for the practice.[108] However, the other scriptures condemn polygamy when it is not authorized by God.[109]

Does section 132 contradict Jacob 2?

No. Both Doctrine and Covenants 132 and Jacob 2 teach that plural marriage is instituted by God to "raise up seed unto [Him]" and also warn against the unrighteous actions of David and Solomon, highlighting that their practices were not always approved by God.[110]

Does section 132 contradict the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible?

No. The revisions Joseph Smith made in the JST, specifically passages in 1 Kings that discuss David and Solomon's plural marriages, do not contradict the teachings of section 132.[111]

Does section 132 allow for monogamously sealed people to be exalted?

It's unclear, but probably.[112] In the past, some Church leaders taught that plural marriage was a requirement for exaltation,[113] whereas others taught that this was not true.[114] Shortly after the release of the 1890 Manifesto, President George Q. Cannon taught that exaltation could be received without polygamy.[115]

The Facts

  • Doctrine and Covenants 132 was revealed to Joseph Smith on July 12, 1843, in response to his questions about biblical figures having multiple wives and concubines.

  • William Clayton reported that he recorded the revelation, but this copy no longer exists.

  • Joseph C. Kingsbury made a copy of the Clayton revelation shortly after its reception, and this Kingsbury manuscript became Section 132.

  • Section 132 was first published in 1852 in the Deseret News and was added to the Doctrine and Covenants in 1876.

  • Section 132 was canonized in 1880 by a sustaining vote in general conference.

Our Take

Doctrine and Covenants 132 can be a challenging text for many Latter-day Saints. This particular revelation addresses Joseph Smith's questions on eternal marriage and plural marriage, but it also raises other difficult questions regarding the Prophet and his practice of plural marriage. For many Latter-day Saints, plural marriage remains a sensitive and complicated subject.

The revelation on plural marriage was challenging both when it was originally recorded and later when it was published and canonized—for both men and women. Some accepted the revelation, while others chose to leave the Church. Although Joseph Smith's wife, Emma, was devoted to him, she struggled significantly with the revelation on plural marriage. Some Latter-day Saint women viewed plural marriage as both a trial and a blessing, while others found it simply unbearable.

Because Doctrine and Covenants 132 contains such difficult teachings, some have questioned its authenticity, suggesting it might have originated from Brigham Young rather than Joseph Smith. However, the documentary record—including multiple journal entries, manuscript copies, and eyewitness accounts—confirms that the revelation came directly from Joseph Smith.

The revelation teaches that plural marriage is authorized only when specifically commanded by God; it is not a universal requirement. Although polygamy is no longer practiced within the Church, Doctrine and Covenants 132 remains scripture. Its teachings on eternal marriage continue to hold a central place in the Latter-day Saint faith.

It is natural to struggle with this part of our history. Many faithful members find themselves uncomfortable with plural marriage yet still find significant value in the doctrine of eternal families, which continues to be a cherished belief today.

What's Your Take?

280 characters remaining
These takes are curated for a general audience and may contain minor edits when posted.
Once some Mormonr readers submit their takes, they will appear here. Submit yours above!
Footnotes