Doctrine and Covenants 132 and Polygamy

Doctrine and Covenants Section 132 Timeline
Pre-Publication History of Section 132
June 1829
Circa 1831
August 1835
Circa 1835-1836
April 3, 1836
Circa 1841
In Nauvoo, Joseph Smith begins being sealed to other women under the principle of plural marriage.[10]
July 12, 1843
Circa July 12–13, 1843
Circa July 13–15 1843
July 16, 1843
Joseph Smith gives a sermon echoing language from the revelation, teaching that a man must enter into an "everlasting covenant" with his wife, but does not explicitly mention plural marriage.[15]
August 12, 1843
Circa August 23–28, 1843
Circa 1843–1844
October 28, 1843
January 5, 1844
April 8, 1844
Hyrum recounts at a Church conference how Joseph taught him about eternal plural sealings.[24]
June 7, 1844
Content from the revelation on plural marriage is paraphrased in the Nauvoo Expositor.[25]
June 8, 1844
Hyrum appears to confirm the existence of the plural marriage revelation in a meeting with the Nauvoo City Council.[26]
June 10, 1844
Joseph alludes to concepts in the plural marriage revelation in a Nauvoo City Council meeting.[27]
June 27, 1844
Joseph is murdered in Carthage, Illinois.[28]
November 1, 1844
Circa 1846–1847
Circa 1846–1847
Brigham Young is given the manuscript copy of the revelation on plural marriage by Newel K. Whitney.[31]
Publication History of Section 132
August 29, 1852
September 14, 1852
Section 132 is printed by the Church for the first time by the Deseret News in Salt Lake City.[33]
January 1853
Section 132 is printed in both The Seer and the Millennial Star.[34]
1876
Section 132 is included in a new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants.[35]
1878
Section 132 is included in a new edition of the Pearl of Great Price.[36]
October 10, 1880
In general conference, Church members formally accept a new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, which contained section 132.[37]
1921
A new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants prepared by the Church removes the Lectures on Faith but retains sections 132.[38]
1981
A new edition of the Doctrine and Covenants prepared by the Church retains section 132.[39]
2013
The Church revises the 1981 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants, retaining section 132.[40]
What is Doctrine and Covenants 132?
It is a revelation that was given to Joseph Smith[BIO] on July 12, 1843,[41] in response to his questions about the wives and concubines of people in the Bible and Emma Smith's[BIO] concerns about plural marriage.[42] It provides teachings on eternal marriage and the keys of the priesthood.[43]
When Doctrine and Covenants 132 was canonized in 1880,[44] it replaced the earlier Section 101, which had outlined the general law of marriage for the Church.[45]
What does section 132 have to do with polygamy?
Doctrine and Covenants 132 outlines the new and everlasting covenant of marriage and specifies that celestial marriage is required for exaltation.[46] It also states that plural marriage is justified when God commands it.[47]
Does section 132 command everyone to practice polygamy?
No. Doctrine and Covenants 132 states that plural marriage is only authorized for those whom God specifically commands.[48]
Wait, didn't Joseph receive revelation to practice plural marriage after he married other women?
No, probably not. Doctrine and Covenants 132 is the earliest known written revelation on plural marriage from Joseph, but he was reportedly receiving revelation on the subject as early as 1831.[49][50]
Related Question
Did Joseph Smith marry other women before the written revelation on eternal marriage and polygamy?
Read more in Joseph Smith and Fanny Alger
Why would Joseph be asking the Lord about this?
Joseph had reportedly already been receiving revelation on plural marriage,[51] and Emma had concerns about the practice.[52] Hyrum urged Joseph to write down a revelation on celestial and plural marriage, believing he could convince Emma of its truth and bring peace.[53]
Related Question
How did Emma Smith feel about plural marriage?
Read more in Joseph Smith and Polygamy
How do we know that section 132 was from Joseph Smith?
It was recorded by William Clayton[BIO] in the presence of Hyrum Smith,[BIO][54] and both Joseph and Clayton recorded the event in their journals.[55][56] Early manuscript copies of the revelation were made by Joseph C. Kingsbury, Willard Richards, and Horace K. Whitney,[57] and accounts from eyewitnesses record that they saw a copy of the revelation or were informed of its contents.[58]

Is the oldest manuscript of Doctrine and Covenants 132 in Joseph's handwriting?
No. None of Joseph Smith's revelations are in his handwriting.[60]
The original manuscript was recorded by William Clayton, Joseph's scribe,[61] but it no longer exists.[62] The oldest surviving copy of the revelation was transcribed by Joseph C. Kingsbury,[BIO] one of Joseph's Nauvoo clerks, who copied the revelation within days after the original was recorded.[63] Horace K. Whitney,[BIO] another of Joseph's scribes, and Willard Richards[BIO] also recorded copies of the revelation.[64]
I've heard section 132 was altered by Brigham Young. Is that true?
No. While the original manuscript no longer exists,[65] the copy of it made within days of the revelation by Joseph C. Kingsbury has not been altered, and except for punctuation and spelling, matches the Richards and Whitney copies of the revelation,[66] which all match the 1852 published copy.[67][68]
Did Joseph Smith ever say section 132 wasn’t from him?
No. There is no record of Joseph ever denying that he received Doctrine and Covenants 132. Four days after the revelation was written down,[69] he publicly taught some of the principles found in it but did not mention polygamy.[70]
But didn't Joseph deny he practiced polygamy?
Yes. Joseph Smith publicly denied being involved in polygamy while privately practicing it.[71]
When was section 132 first presented to the Saints?
Doctrine and Covenants 132 was first privately shared with a select group of Saints before Joseph’s death.[72] Hyrum read it to a group of elders in the Nauvoo high council,[73] and three council members left the Church shortly afterward.[74]
The revelation was first published by the Deseret News in 1852,[75] the same year plural marriage was publicly announced by the Church.[76] It first appeared in the Doctrine and Covenants in 1876[77] and was canonized by sustaining vote in 1880.[78]

Why did it take so long for it to get officially canonized?
It's unclear. The practice of plural marriage was kept secret during Joseph's lifetime and remained secret even when the 1844 version of the Doctrine and Covenants was published,[80] the year after the revelation was given.[81]
The revelation was published in the Deseret News in 1852,[82] but canonization did not take place until it was included in the 1876 edition of the Doctrine and Covenants,[83] along with 25 other revelations,[84] which was canonized in 1880.[85]
How did the Saints react to the revelation?
Some left the Church when they learned about the revelation,[86] while others accepted it as inspired.[87]
How did Emma react to it?
Emma was reportedly very upset by the revelation and struggled with its teachings.[88] She also reportedly burned the original copy of the manuscript,[89] although decades later, Emma denied doing so.[90]
Does Section 132 threaten that Emma would be "destroyed" if she doesn't accept plural marriage?
Yes. Section 132 states that Emma will be "destroyed" if she does not abide by "this commandment," which refers to accepting plural marriage.[91] This warning likely refers to spiritual consequences or the potential loss of exaltation for failing to obey God's commandments.[92][93]
The revelation states that if Emma did not accept "this commandment," Joseph would "do all things for her, even as he hath said,"[94] which is likely referring to deeding property to her.[95][96]
Was polygamy actually practiced in the bible?
Yes. The Bible mentions several people who practiced polygamy, including Abraham, Jacob, Isaac, Moses, Solomon, and David.[97]
Examples of Biblical Figures who Practiced Polygamy
Biblical Figure | Wives and/or Concubines |
Abraham[BIO] | Abraham was married to Sarah,[BIO] Hagar,[BIO] and later Keturah,[BIO] along with unnamed concubines.[98] |
Jacob[BIO] | Jacob was married to Leah,[BIO] Rachel,[BIO] and their handmaids, Bilhah[BIO] and Zilpah.[BIO][99] |
Isaac[BIO] | In the Bible, Isaac is only ever mentioned as being married to Rebekah[BIO][100] Section 132 seems to indicate that Isaac had additional wives that were not mentioned in the Bible,[101] but it's unclear.[102] |
Moses[BIO] | Moses was married to Zipporah,[BIO] a Midianite, and an Ethiopian woman, possibly named Tharbis,[BIO][103] though no concubines are mentioned in scripture.[104] |
Solomon[BIO] | Solomon had 700 wives and 300 concubines, which ultimately led to his spiritual downfall.[105] |
David[BIO] | David had multiple wives, including Abigail and Ahinoam, before becoming king and added more after.[106] |

Does the Bible or other scriptures condemn polygamy?
Yes and no. In the Bible, polygamy seems to be permitted and regulated by the Law of Moses,[107] and its stories show both positive and negative consequences for the practice.[108] However, the other scriptures condemn polygamy when it is not authorized by God.[109]
Related Question
Is polygamy biblical?
Read more in Latter-day Saints and Polygamy
Does section 132 contradict Jacob 2?
No. Both Doctrine and Covenants 132 and Jacob 2 teach that plural marriage is instituted by God to "raise up seed unto [Him]" and also warn against the unrighteous actions of David and Solomon, highlighting that their practices were not always approved by God.[110]
Does section 132 contradict the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible?
No. The revisions Joseph Smith made in the JST, specifically passages in 1 Kings that discuss David and Solomon's plural marriages, do not contradict the teachings of section 132.[111]
Does section 132 allow for monogamously sealed people to be exalted?
It's unclear, but probably.[112] In the past, some Church leaders taught that plural marriage was a requirement for exaltation,[113] whereas others taught that this was not true.[114] Shortly after the release of the 1890 Manifesto, President George Q. Cannon taught that exaltation could be received without polygamy.[115]
Related Question
Is polygamy a requirement to be in the Celestial Kingdom?
Read more in Polygamy in Eternity