NW and LW defend DS teachings in disciplinary council.

Date
Nov 5, 2017
Type
Letter
Source
Nelson Whiting
LDS
Disaffected
Hearsay
Direct
Reference

Nelson Whiting and Lacey Whiting, "Disciplinary Counsel Defense," salemthoughts.com (November 11, 2017), 2-3;14, accessed July 14, 2021

Scribe/Publisher
salemthoughts.com
People
Denver Snuffer, Nelson Whiting, Lacey Whiting
Audience
Internet Public
PDF
Transcription

He stated that our re-baptism, a thoroughly scriptural and historical LDS practice, is another reason for him to confirm the allegation that we have indulged in misconduct worthy of discipline. When I made it clear that we were re-baptized independent of one Denver Snuffer’s teachings on the subject, and indeed by revelation from the Lord, President Marshall’s only explanation was that re-baptism is simply not church practice. I asked him to share with me where he finds that as an official church stance worthy of discipline, which he admitted he had only heard as counsel to him in private leadership trainings. . . . If you think to excommunicate us based on our belief in the words of one Denver Snuffer, we would tell you to be careful. We believe he is a servant teaching the light of the everlasting gospel from the scriptures to help some few repent. Keep in mind that if there is one thing the scriptures say about rejecting true prophets, it is clear that rejecting them keeps you from meeting the cutoff level from physical destruction and abiding the day when Christ comes. So consideration, at the very least, should be given to someone claiming such a message as Denver Snuffer.

Copyright © B. H. Roberts Foundation
The B. H. Roberts Foundation is not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.