C4CA determines that domestic partnerships are compatible with Proposition 22.

Date
Apr 4, 2005
Type
Speech / Court Transcript
Source
California Third Court of Appeals
Non-LDS
Hearsay
Direct
Reference

Knight v. Superior Court 128 Cal.App.4th 14 (Cal. Ct. App. 2005), accessed February 25, 2021

Scribe/Publisher
California Third Court of Appeals
People
California Third Court of Appeals
Audience
General Public
Transcription

The numerous dissimilarities between the two types of unions disclose that the Legislature has not created a "same-sex marriage" under the guise of another name. For all of the reasons stated above, we conclude the trial judge correctly ruled that the Legislature’s enactment of section 297.5 did not constitute an amendment of Proposition 22: that the statute thus became effective without separate approval by the electorate: and, therefore, that section 297.5 is not void.

Citations in Mormonr Qnas
Copyright © B. H. Roberts Foundation
The B. H. Roberts Foundation is not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.