SCOTUS determines that anti-sodomy laws are unconstitutional.

Date
Jun 26, 2003
Type
Government Document
Source
Supreme Court of the United States
Non-LDS
Hearsay
Direct
Reference

Lawrence v. Texas (02-102) 539 U.S. 558 (2003)

Scribe/Publisher
Supreme Court of the United States
People
John Geddes Lawrence, Tyron Garner, Supreme Court of the United States, State of Texas
Audience
General Public
Transcription

The present case does not involve minors. It does not involve persons who might be injured or coerced or who are situated in relationships where consent might not easily be refused. It does not involve public conduct or prostitution. It does not involve whether the government must give formal recognition to any relationship that homosexual persons seek to enter. The case does involve two adults who, with full and mutual consent from each other, engaged in sexual practices common to a homosexual lifestyle. The petitioners are entitled to respect for their private lives. The State cannot demean their existence or control their destiny by making their private sexual conduct a crime. Their right to liberty under the Due Process Clause gives them the full right to engage in their conduct without intervention of the government. “It is a promise of the Constitution that there is a realm of personal liberty which the government may not enter.” Casey, supra, at 847. The Texas statute furthers no legitimate state interest which can justify its intrusion into the personal and private life of the individual.

Citations in Mormonr Qnas
Copyright © B. H. Roberts Foundation
The B. H. Roberts Foundation is not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.