John Joseph Collins discusses the term "Most High" in Daniel 7:18; concludes the plural in the Aramaic is a "plural of manifestations" and should be translated in the singular.

Date
1993
Type
Book
Source
John Joseph Collins
Non-LDS
Hearsay
Secondary
Reference

John Joseph Collins, Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel (Hermeneia—a Critical and Historical Commentary on the Bible; Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1993), 312 (Logos Bible Software edition)

Scribe/Publisher
Fortress Press, Logos
People
John Joseph Collins
Audience
Reading Public
Transcription

18. The holy ones of the Most High: The traditional translation of קדישׁי עליונין (“holy ones of the Most High”) assumes that עליונין is used substantivally, presumably to refer to God, who is called עליא in 7:25* and elsewhere in Daniel. The plural עליונין is then explained as a plural of majesty, on the analogy of the Hebrew אלהים. The construct chain is definite because עליונין is considered a proper name. The Hebrew קדושׁי עליון in CD 20:8 may be cited as a parallel, but its value is ambiguous, because it renders “the Most High” by the singular and so does not relieve the anomaly of Dan 7:18.

An alternative translation, “most high holy ones” or “holy ones on high,” has recently been defended by Goldingay, who explains the second term of the construct chain (עליונין) as epexegetical or adjectival. The plural of the second term, then, would correspond with the number of the first. The phrase would be indefinite and is equivalent to קדישׁין עליונין. The Aramaic for “highest,” however, is עליא (plural). עליון is an epithet for the Deity. The plural, then, should be taken as a plural of manifestations and the traditional translation maintained.

Citations in Mormonr Qnas
Copyright © B. H. Roberts Foundation
The B. H. Roberts Foundation is not owned by, operated by, or affiliated with the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.